J Stroke Search


J Stroke > Volume 22(3); 2020 > Article
Bhatia, Pedapati, Komakula, Srivastava, Vishnubhatla, and Khurana: Stroke in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review


Background and Purpose

Various neurological findings including stroke in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been described, although no clarity exists regarding the nature and pattern of this association. This systematic review aims to report the characteristics of stroke in patients with COVID-19.


Three authors independently searched Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed starting from inception up to May 22, 2020. The data for individual patients was extracted where available from published reports including clinical and laboratory parameters and analysed for any significant associations between variables.


We identified 30 relevant articles involving 115 patients with acute or subacute stroke with COVID-19. The mean±standard deviation age was 62.5±14.5 years. Stroke was ischemic in majority of the patients (101 [87.8%]). Hypertension (42 [42%]), dyslipidaemia (24 [26.1%]), and diabetes (23 [23.2%]) were the major vascular risk factors. Most of the patients (80 [85.1%]) had COVID-19 symptoms at the time of stroke with a median interval of 10 days to stroke from the diagnosis of COVID-19. Three-fourths (86 [74.8%]) of the patients were critically ill which frequently delayed the diagnosis of stroke. High levels of D-dimer, and ferritin were observed in these patients. Patients with COVID-19 and stroke had a high mortality (47.9%). Factors associated with mortality were intensive care unit admission, having two or more vascular risk factors, particularly smoking and high levels of D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase.


The association between stroke and COVID-19 is probably multifactorial including an amalgamation of traditional vascular risk factors, proinflammatory and a prothrombotic state. Prospectively collected data is required in the future to confirm this hypothesis.


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global health emergency. What started as a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, rapidly escalated to a worldwide pandemic, paralyzing human activities and causing enormous deaths [1]. As on the day of submission of this manuscript, 7,039,918 people have developed the disease and 404,396 have died [2].
Various papers over the recent times have commented upon the clinical characteristics, complications and outcome of patients infected with COVID-19 [3,4]. Amongst the varied manifestations of COVID-19, neurological features have been highlighted by numerous authors [5-7]. Stroke is one of the common comorbidities that has been described. Ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) have all been reported with variable frequencies [8-10]. However, no clarity exists whether COVID-19 is causative or just co-exists or triggers the occurrence of stroke. It is imperative to glean from the published data, stroke characteristics like type, severity, underlying vascular risk factors, biochemical and prothrombotic abnormalities and outcome. Synthesizing this information will provide a clearer overview and may help understand the relation between stroke and COVID-19. This systematic review aims to analyse the information reported among published studies of stroke in COVID-19.


The systematic review has been carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [11]. However, the protocol was not pre-registered in view of time constraints.

Literature search

Three authors independently searched Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed to identify articles evaluating both COVID-19 and Stroke starting from inception up to May 22, 2020. The three authors participated in each phase of the review independently (screening, eligibility, and inclusion). Individual databases were searched with the terms ‘COVID-19 AND stroke,’ ‘COVID-19 AND cerebrovascular disease,’ ‘COVID-19 AND ischemic stroke,’ ‘COVID-19 AND ICH,’ 'COVID-19 AND intracerebral haemorrhage,’ ‘COVID-19 AND neurology,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND stroke,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND cerebrovascular disease,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND ischemic stroke,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND ICH,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND intracerebral haemorrhage,’ ‘SARS-CoV-2 AND neurology,’ ‘Thrombolysis AND COVID-19,’ ‘Thrombectomy AND COVID-19’, ‘Thrombolysis AND SARS-CoV-2’, ‘Thrombectomy AND SARSCoV-2,’ ‘Stroke imaging AND COVID-19,’ without any filters. No language restrictions were applied. Database searches were combined, and duplicates were removed. Titles and abstracts were then reviewed for relevance and full texts of the relevant articles were evaluated for eligibility. To ensure literature saturation, the authors scanned the reference lists of the included studies or relevant reviews identified through the search. Studies not meeting inclusion criteria or having one or more exclusion criteria were filtered. Any disagreement regarding search strategy, inclusion or exclusion criteria was resolved through discussions. None of the authors were blind to the journal titles, study authors or institutions. Data from each article was extracted into an excel sheet with predefined variables.

Inclusion criteria

All published trials, observational studies, case series and case reports mentioning stroke in at least one patient either as a complication of COVID-19 or occurrence in a close temporal relationship to COVID-19 diagnosis (acute to subacute stroke).

Exclusion criteria

All review articles, consensus statements, letter to the editors which did not have clinical information related to patients with stroke and COVID-19 were excluded.

Data extraction

The following data was extracted from the included studies wherever available: study author(s), study design, individual patient data including age, sex, severity of COVID-19, presence or absence of COVID-19 symptoms at the onset or diagnosis of stroke, type of stroke, days from the diagnosis of COVID-19 to onset or diagnosis of stroke, imaging, comorbidities, laboratory values, treatment, and outcome. Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) [12] classification for stroke subtype was extracted if specifically mentioned and based on radiological and other information available. All patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) were considered “critically ill” in the present review. The clinical outcomes variably reported in articles were grouped into three categories; ‘survivors,’ ‘still hospitalized at the time of publication,’ or ‘non-survivors’ for whom such data was available. Where no information on outcome was available at all, the patients were grouped in the “no information” category and their outcomes could not be analysed.

Quality assessment

We have rated the level of evidence for individual studies according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine’s Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation (Supplementary Table 1) [13]. Risk of bias was not assessed systematically.

Characteristics and outcome assessment

The data was analysed to observe demographics, stroke types, severity of clinical status, vascular risk factors, TOAST classification of IS, biochemical data, and mortality. We compared the clinical, imaging, and/or laboratory variables between (1) patients who had symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of stroke and those who did not; (2) patients who were critically ill and those who were not; and (3) survivors and non-survivors. Predictors of mortality were also analysed.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Continuous variables which had a normal or near normal distribution are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) and those which did not have normal distribution are expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). Comparisons between categorical variables was done by chi-square test and continuous variables was done by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test wherever applicable. Logistic regression was applied to determine independent predictors of survival and odds ratio calculated wherever applicable. A two tailed P-value of ≤0.05 was taken as significant. All the analyses were done using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA).


Of 2,801 articles yielded from initial search, 30 were included for our final analysis (Figure 1). The various keyword sets used in the literature search are mentioned in the methodology section and their results are outlined in Supplementary Table 2. Among 30 records included in the final analysis, 16 were case reports, eight were case series, five were retrospective observational studies, and one was a prospective observational study. The characteristics of all the 30 records are outlined in Supplementary Table 3. The risk of bias was not assessed systematically but was likely to be high in all studies since most of them were case reports, case series, and retrospective observational studies.
A total of 115 patients with acute or subacute stroke infected with SARS-CoV-2 from the 30 studies included were analysed in this systematic review. Majority of the variables had missing data and those patients with the missing data for a certain variable were excluded from analysis of the given variable. The characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.
The mean±SD age of the patients was 62.5±14.5 years. Majority of the patients were males (42 [62%]). IS (101 [87.8%]) was the most common type of stroke followed by ICH (6 [5.2%]) and CVT (3 [2.6%]). Two patients had both ICH and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) (1.7%), one patient (0.9%) each had SAH and transient ischemic attack (TIA) and one patient (0.9%) had both SAH and IS. The median number of days to the onset (detection in case of unclear onset) of stroke was 10 days with half of all strokes occurring within the first 10 days of the COVID-19 diagnosis. Approximately one-third of all strokes occurred within an additional 10 days from the diagnosis of COVID-19. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 11.5, but this data was available only for 16 patients. Among 89 patients where data was available, presentation of clinical stroke syndrome could be identified in 70 (78.7%) patients, the rest being diagnosed on cranial imaging done for any change in neurological status during admission.
The most common risk factor identified was hypertension (HTN, 42 [42%]), followed by dyslipidaemia (24 [26.1%]), diabetes mellitus (23 [23.2%]), atrial fibrillation (AF, 11 [11.2%]), coronary artery disease (10 [10.2%]), smoking (9 [14.3%]), previous stroke (7 [7.1%]), heart failure (4 [4.1%]), alcoholism (3 [5.2%]), and pacemaker (1 [1%]). Five patients had malignancies including lung (two patients), prostrate (one patient), stomach (one patient), and nasopharyngeal cancer (one patient). One patient each had chronic kidney disease and chronic obstructive lung disease. The most common subtype of IS was large artery atherosclerosis (LAD) (25 [35.2%]) followed by cryptogenic (23 [32.4%]), cardioembolic (CE, 10 [14.1%]), other determined causes (7 [9.9%]), and small vessel disease (6 [8.4%]) respectively. As per the available data, five patients had positive anticardiolipin antibodies (Table 1) with immunoglobulin M (IgM) in two and IgA in three patients. Among these patients, anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgA and IgG were present in three patients as well. No absolute titres were available from the studies. Five patients had lupus anticoagulant (LA) positive (Table 1).
Computed tomography (CT) scan of brain and CT angiography were the predominant structural and vascular imaging modalities employed for stroke, respectively. Brain imaging patterns of ischemia were available for 39 patients (33.9%). Most commonly observed pattern was uni-hemispheric, anterior circulation infarct confined to a single vascular territory (19 [48.7% of 39]) with majority (14 [73.7%]) of them having large artery disease. Eleven patients (28.2% of 39) had bi-hemispheric infarcts in multiple vascular territories with majority (7 [63.6% of 11]) of them having either positive antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) or LA. Five patients (12.8% of 39) had posterior circulation stroke in a single vascular territory, three (7.6% of 39) had lacunar strokes and one (2.5% of 39) patient had uni-hemispheric infarcts in more than one vascular territory. Of 13 patients with available information on chest X-ray, 11 (84.6%) had abnormal findings suggestive of COVID-19. CT chest was found abnormal for all patients (n=46) who underwent. Eight patients underwent CT pulmonary angiography and five (62.5%) of them were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism.
Eighty (85.1%) patients were symptomatic for COVID 19 at the time of presentation with stroke. The differences between patients with or without symptoms for COVID-19 at the time of stroke are outlined in Table 2. The mean age of those who were symptomatic for COVID-19 at the time of stroke was significantly more (64±17 years) than that of those who were asymptomatic (55±17 years; P=0.05). The C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in those who have symptoms specific to COVID-19 at the time of stroke (mean±SD of 129.9±14.3 mg/L) than those who did not (55.3±67.1 mg/L; P=0.02). Rest of the laboratory parameters did not differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Three-fourths (86 [74.8%]) of the patients were in critical condition requiring ICU admission. The characteristics of these patients when compared with those who were not critically ill are mentioned in Table 3. These patients had a longer time to the onset (detection in case of unclear onset) of stroke (13.2±8.7 days) when compared to those who were not critically ill (4.8±4.3 days; P=0.0002). The stroke was identified on imaging obtained for reasons other than clinical suspicion of acute stroke in 19 (21.3%) patients and all of them were critically ill (P=0.01). The CRP levels were not significantly different in critically ill and non-critically ill patients though there was a trend of CRP being higher in the former group. The values of ferritin were significantly higher in critically ill patients (2,691±1,661) than those who were not (434±400 μg/L; P=0.002). Similarly, the platelet counts, troponin level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international normalised ratio, and fibrinogen levels, all differed significantly between these two groups as shown in Table 3.
Treatment details were available in 96 (83.4%) patients. Twenty patients received reperfusion therapy. The mean age of these patients was 59.1±14.21 years. The median NIHSS was 13 (IQR, 2 to 23) at presentation and was available in only 10 patients. Intravenous or intraarterial recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) was given to 13 patients (13.5%; six without and seven combined with endovascular thrombectomy [EVT]), was not indicated in 24 (25%) and no information was available in 59 (61.4%). EVT was performed in 14 (14.6%; alone in seven and in combination with rTPA in seven patients), was not indicated in 27 (28.1%) and no information was available in 55 (57.2%) patients. Door to CT, door to needle and door to puncture times were not available in most of the records even in strokes which occurred during the hospital stay and hence could not be analysed.
Stroke mechanisms in these patients were large artery disease in eight, CE in three, cryptogenic stroke in four, and not reported in five patients. Acute complications were not mentioned except for one patient who had delayed haemorrhagic transformation requiring decompression surgery. Among the available data on outcomes, eight patients were discharged either to home (n=1) or rehabilitation facility (n=4) or was not mentioned (n=3); three patients died; five patients were still in the hospital as per the published reports and in four patients details of outcome were not available. Long-term outcomes were not available for these patients.
Anticoagulation was given to 54 (56.3%) patients, was not indicated in 10 (10.4%) and it was not mentioned whether rest of the patients 32 (33.3%) received any form of anticoagulation. Thirty-three (34.4%) patients received antiplatelet therapy, 13 (13.6%) had no indication for the same and 50 (52%) did not have information with regards to the receipt of antiplatelets. The anticoagulation was therapeutic in some, prophylactic in others and for unclear reasons in rest of them.
Clinical outcome was available for 90 patients (78.2%). Among them, 17 were still hospitalized at the time of article publication. Among the remaining 73 patients for whom definitive outcomes in terms of survival was available, mortality was observed in 35 (out of 73) patients (47.9%) and definitive cause of death was not available in all patients. Of note, majority (33 [94.3% of 35]) of them were critically ill. In five patients, severe stroke was the proximate cause of death. In four patients, withdrawal of care was requested by the family. In 21 patients, no specific cause was mentioned, but it is likely that a combination of severe COVID-19 as well as comorbidity with stroke caused death, as these patients were critically sick as per the details available. Other causes of death included pneumonia in two patients, severe hemodynamic instability in one, septic shock in one, and systemic thromboembolism in one patient. The clinical and laboratory data was compared between survivors and nonsurvivors (Table 4). Patients who died had more severe illness at the outset. They were more likely to be smokers and to have two or more vascular risk factors, higher levels of D-dimer, CRP, and LDH as compared to survivors. The clinical status of the 17 patients who were still hospitalized by the time the respective articles were published was presented in Supplementary Table 4. Most of these patients were critically ill and at high risk of death. Hence, we conducted a worst case scenario analysis which considered these patients as ‘non-survivors’ and compared them with ‘survivors’ (Supplementary Table 5). Factors associated with mortality in this scenario were ICU admission, dyslipidemia, presence of two or more vascular risk factors, high levels of serum ferritin, CRP, D-dimer, and LDH.


The present review summarizes the data from the available literature on stroke in patients with COVID-19. Expanding information on neurological features among patients with COVID-19 indicates cerebrovascular disease as an important comorbidity [8-10]. Although the data were observational and limited, this review would help broaden our understanding regarding the association of COVID-19 and stroke in the current time.
There is still an uncertainty in the relationship between stroke and COVID-19. It is unclear whether it is causative or just coincidental [14-16]. The median time to develop stroke in the current review was 10 days from the diagnosis of COVID-19 and was much longer in the critically-ill patients. In fact, many of these critically-ill patients had a delayed diagnosis of stroke based on neuroimaging findings due to a lack of clinical suspicion in presence of multisystem dysfunction and/or likely difficulty in assessing the neurological status, particularly in sedated and ventilated patients. This may reflect an impact of infection, inflammation and extreme cytokine activity on systemic and neurological deterioration [17]. Although cytokine levels were not measured in most of the studies in this review, levels of CRP, ferritin, LDH, and D-dimer were found to be very high and more so among sick patients.
Evidence of abnormal coagulation parameters associated with COVID-19 appeared in early reports from China. The first report of 99 hospitalized patients in Wuhan showed that inflammatory biomarkers of interleukin-6, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, D-dimer, and other coagulation parameters were increased or deranged [18]. High levels of D-dimer were observed in the present review which might be due to COVID-19 associated inflammation and the consequent downstream triggering of coagulation cascade [19].
Higher age and CRP levels were observed among patients symptomatic for COVID-19 at the time of diagnosis of stroke. Reports elucidating differences between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative strokes have also found higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers among the former [10]. Though this review focused on patients with COVID-19 and stroke, one of the studies included in the present review had compared characteristics of stroke in patients with and without COVID-19. The patients with COVID-19 were younger and often had cryptogenic, severe and fatal strokes. These findings suggest that there may be important differences in the pathophysiology of the stroke with and without COVID-19 [10].
Role of infection in the occurrence of stroke has been previously outlined [20-22]. Preceding respiratory infections, in particular were found to have a higher association with stroke. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 and its contribution to stroke is a conundrum. A recent report did not find SARSCoV-2 in the CSF of patients with stroke [23], but another contemporary published data from an autopsy series showed viral copies in brain tissue. This autopsy series showed organotropism for multiple organs including lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, brain, and blood, indicating that the virus can directly invade the brain, albeit not preferentially [24]. In a previous autopsy study, SARS-CoV, which caused a SARS outbreak in 2002 and shares homological sequence with SARS‐CoV-2, was identified in the human brain, suggesting that SARS‐CoV-2 might also have neurotropism [25].
Although conventional risk factors were not mentioned in detail among all the studies, higher age, HTN, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and AF were commonly observed. Interestingly, comorbidity with cancer was also reported, albeit in few patients. Presence of vascular risk factors could be independently associated with occurrence of stroke among patients with COVID-19. This is supported by the observation that the most common imaging pattern of IS in the present review was infarcts in a single vascular territory with majority of them having LAD. Cryptogenic stroke constituted a significant proportion in this review, but this data could be confounded by the fact that many studies have not outlined stroke aetiology probably due to constraints of complete evaluation. Since we did not contact the authors of the published reports individually, this data may not reflect the exact nature of stroke mechanism. Thus, conventional risk factors might play a significant role in the pathogenesis of stroke in patients with COVID-19. In fact, people with underlying vascular risk factors were also likely to have worse outcomes with COVID-19, suggesting a complex relationship between COVID-19, vascular comorbidity, and stroke occurrence [26].
The pattern of the stroke as well as imaging findings in some patients with multifocal infarcts, haemorrhage and venous thrombosis hints at a disseminated thrombosis [27] or inflammatory vasculitis, supported by high D-dimer levels, pulmonary thromboembolism [26] as well as evidence of endothelial inflammation and target organ injury [28-30]. Presence of APLA and LA in some patients also points towards a prothrombotic cascade. This is also supported by the observation that the second most common pattern of cerebral ischemia on imaging in our review was bi-hemispheric infarcts in multiple vascular territories suggesting a diffuse coagulopathy and these patients had high frequency (7 out of 11 [63.6%]) of either positive APLA or LA although titres of these antibodies was not available. APLA can induce thrombosis through interference with endogenous anticoagulant mechanisms, activation of platelets, activation of the complement cascade, interaction with endothelial cells and inducing expression of adhesion molecules and tissue factor [31]. COVID-19 might stimulate the production of APLA as a mechanism of IS, although post infectious APLA is transient and not usually associated with thrombosis [32]. Pathogenic role of these antibodies among patients with COVID-19 is still uncertain.
Treatment details were available in a limited number of patients for us to make any inference on the benefit or harm of acute stroke therapy. Some patients who seemed to have a usual stroke phenotype were treated with revascularization therapy. In other patients, where stroke was detected incidentally, the patterns of ischemia and unclear onset time might have precluded this treatment. Many patients who were receiving anticoagulation had cryptogenic strokes, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms might have been uncertain and perceived either as embolic or prothrombotic. Considering the fact that SARS-CoV-2 binds to the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor protein and downregulates it, a concern regarding the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 was raised, but was negated due to lack of a sound scientific evidence [33-35]. We do not have details of patient’s medications or biochemical measurements of angiotensin or ACE levels for making a definitive statement in this regard.
High mortality was observed in the current review. Smoking, having two or more vascular risk factors, ICU stay, high D-dimer, CRP, and LDH levels increased the odds of death significantly. Predictors of mortality observed in the previous studies were pneumonia, multiorgan failure [36], critically ill state, high CRP, D-dimer [5,19], presence of vascular risk factors, and other co-morbidities [8].
The study has limitations. Individual patient data was missing for many variables and we did not contact authors to gather this information. A high chance of bias exists in view of observational nature of the studies included. The available data pertaining to the differences between COVID-19 positive and negative strokes was very limited at the time of this review. Also, patients with minor strokes may not have been well represented as this study included only COVID positive stroke patients and observations in general suggest that mild strokes presenting to the emergency seemed to have declined during this pandemic [10]. Caution is advised in the interpretation of laboratory data as information on the temporal profile of tests in relation to the disease onset is not available. We could not assess precise outcomes of stroke survivors due to lack of information about functional disability in majority of the patients and absence of follow-up data.


The present systematic review suggests that stroke in COVID-19 is probably multifactorial. This is supported by presence of vascular risk factors, a high inflammatory marker response, D-dimer levels and presence of APLAs in these subjects. Outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and associated stroke may be poor, especially among patients with severe COVID-19 and elevated levels of inflammatory markers. Prospectively collected comparative data on stroke phenotypes, treatment details and outcomes among patients with and without COVID-19 is much needed to improve our understanding regarding this emerging association.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2020.02264.
Supplementary Table 1.
Study assessment according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine’s Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation1,*
Supplementary Table 2.
Results of search for various keyword sets
Supplementary Table 3.
Clinical and laboratory data of individual studies included in the review
Supplementary Table 4.
Clinical status of patients who were still hospitalised at the time of publication of corresponding articles
Supplementary Table 5.
Comparison of survivors and non-survivors assuming worst case scenario*
Supplementary References


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figure 1.
Flow chart of study selection.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the patients*
Characteristic All patients (n=115)
Age (n=100) (yr) 62.5±14.5
Sex (n=68)
 Female 26 (38.2)
 Male 42 (61.8)
Symptomatic for COVID-19 at the time of stroke (n=94) 80 (85.1)
Type of stroke (n=115)
 Ischaemic stroke 101 (87.8)
 Intracerebral haemorrhage 6 (5.2)
 Intracerebral haemorrhage with subarachnoid haemorrhage 2 (1.7)
 Cerebral venous thrombosis 3 (2.6)
 Ischaemic stroke with subarachnoid haemorrhage 1 (0.9)
 Subarachnoid haemorrhage 1 (0.9)
 Transient ischaemic attack 1 (0.9)
NIHSS (n=16) 11.5 (3.3-18.3)
TOAST category (n=71)
 Large artery disease 25 (35.2)
 Small vessel disease 6 (8.4)
 Cardioembolic 10 (14.1)
 Other 7 (9.9)
 Cryptogenic 23 (32.4)
Critical illness (n=115) 86 (74.8)
Imaging modality for stroke (n=95)
 CT 84 (88.4)
 Magnetic resonance imaging 11 (11.6)
Vascular imaging (n=56)
 CT angiography 52 (92.9)
 Magnetic resonance angiography 4 (7.1)
Abnormal chest X-ray (n=13) 11 (84.6)
Abnormal CT chest (n=46) 46 (100)
Abnormal CT pulmonary angiography (n=8) 5 (62.5)
Days to stroke from diagnosis of COVID-19 (n=73) 10 (5-15)
Stroke suspected clinically (n=89) 70 (78.7)
Risk factors
 Hypertension (n=100) 42 (42.0)
 Diabetes (n=99) 23 (23.2)
 Old stroke (n=99) 7 (7.1)
 Smoking (n=63) 9 (14.3)
 Atrial fibrillation (n=98) 11 (11.2)
 Heart failure (n=98) 4 (4.1)
 Pacemaker (n=98) 1 (1.0)
 Dyslipidemia (n=92) 24 (26.1)
 Coronary artery disease (n=98) 10 (10.2)
 Alcoholism (n=58) 3 (5.2)
 Chronic kidney disease (n=15) 1 (6.7)
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=16) 1 (6.3)
 Cancer (n=19) 5 (26.3)
Treatment (n=96)
 Tissue plasminogen activator 13 (13.5)
 Endovascular thrombectomy 14 (14.6)
 Anticoagulant 54 (56.3)
 Antiplatelet 33 (34.4)
Outcome mortality (n=90) 35 (47.9)
C-reactive protein (n=63) (mg/L) 101.1 (31.6-179.9)
D-dimer (n=69) (μg/L) 3,442 (1,159-10,000)
Ferritin (n=17) (μg/L) 655 (134-1,708)
Leucocyte count (n=29) (×109/L) 8.7 (6.7-11.7)
Lymphocyte (n=25) (×109/L) 0.9±0.5
Platelet (n=27) (×109/L) 183 (141-305)
Creatinine (n=20) (μmol/L) 92.84 (71.3-120.3)
Aspartate transaminase (n=15) (U/L) 35 (23-97)
Alanine transaminase (n=18) (U/L) 31 (17.3-51.3)
Procalcitonin (n=8) (μg/L) 0.45 (0.13-2.77)
Troponin (n=24) (pg/mL) 215 (34.5-876.8)
Lactate dehydrogenase (n=20) (U/L) 546±254
Activated partial thromboplastin time (n=19) (sec) 35±13
International normalized ratio (n=11) 1.14 (1.05-1.53)
Prothrombin time (n=10) 14.1 (13.2-15.7)
Fibrinogen (n=16) (g/L) 5.5±1.8
APLA positivity (n=14) 5 (35.7)
Lupus anticoagulant (n=11) 5 (45.5)
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; CT, computed tomography; APLA, antiphospholipid antibody.
* Data is not uniformly available for each patient leading to separate ‘n’ number for each characteristic.
Table 2.
Comparison of characteristics between patients with and without symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of stroke*
Characteristic Symptomatic (n=80) Asymptomatic (n=14) P
Age (n=88) (yr) 64±17 55±17 0.05
C-reactive protein (n=60) (mg/L) 130±103 55±67 0.02
D-dimer (n=58) (μg/L) 7,417±12,010 6,932±8,880 0.76
Ferritin (n=17) (μg/L) 1,290±1,613 956±737 0.71
Leucocyte count (n=28) (×109/L) 9.3±4.5 10.5±4.6 0.36
Lymphocyte count (n=25) (×109/L) 0.9±0.5 1.1±0.5 0.52
Platelet (n=27) (×109/L) 213.3±113.7 261.7±116.8 0.64
Creatinine (n=20) (μmol/L) 117±99 136±27 0.08
Aspartate transaminase (n=15) (U/L) 53±42 52±45 0.77
Alanine transaminase (n=18) (U/L) 43±33 19±5 0.08
Procalcitonin (n=8) (μg/L) 3.2±5.5 0.3±0.3 0.32
Troponin (n=23) (pg/mL) 1,405±4,027 1,623±1,441 0.68
Lactate dehydrogenase (n=20) (U/L) 576±260 429±214 0.31
aPTT (n=19) (sec) 36±14 31±9.9 0.60
International normalized ratio (n=11) 1.5±0.78 0.99 0.11
Prothrombin time (n=10) 14.6±1.9 13.9±0.7 0.9
Fibrinogen (n=16) (g/L) 5.5±1.9 5.2±1.9 0.80
APLA positivity (n=14) 5 (35.7) 0 (0) 0.44
Lupus anticoagulant (n=11) 4 (36.4) 1 (9.1) 0.25
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; APLA, antiphospholipid antibody.
* Data is not uniformly available for each patient leading to separate ‘n’ number for each characteristic;
Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables to calculate P-value unless otherwise specified;
Only single observation was available.
Table 3.
Comparison of characteristics between patients with and without being critically ill*
Characteristic Critically ill (n=86) Non-critically ill (n=29) P
Time to stroke in days (n=70) 13±9 5±4 0.0002§
Clinical strokeⅠⅠ (n=89) 0.01§
 Yes 50 (56.2) 20 (22.5)
 No 19 (21.3) 0 (0)
C-reactive protein (n=63) (mg/L) 130±102 88±96 0.08
D-dimer (n=69) (μg/L) 7,625±11,936 7,712±14,007 0.06
Ferritin (n=17) (μg/L) 2,691±1,661 434±400 0.002§
Leucocyte count (n=29) (×109/L) 11.1±5.9 8.1±2.2 0.30
Lymphocyte count (n=25) (×109/L) 0.8±0.5 1.1±0.5 0.10
Platelet (n=27) (×109/L) 195.3±106.1 292.3±108.3 0.04§
Creatinine (n=20) (μmol/L) 127±108 104±32 0.62
Aspartate transaminase (n=15) (U/L) 56±42 27±12 0.27
Alanine transaminase (n=18) (U/L) 39±36 39±22 0.57
Procalcitonin (n=8) (μg/L) 2.8±5.1 0.08 0.13
Troponin (n=24) (pg/mL) 1,786±4,143 67±77 0.02§
Lactate dehydrogenase (n=20) (U/L) 628±255 356±113 0.02§
aPTT (n=19) (sec) 37±16 32±7 0.42
International normalized ratio (n=11) 1.62±0.9 1.1±0.6 0.02§
Prothrombin time (n=10) 14.6±1.97 13.96±1.06 0.73
Fibrinogen (n=16) (g/L) 6.3±1.9 4.5±1.1 0.04§
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; APLA, antiphospholipid antibody.
* Data is not uniformly available for each patient leading to separate ‘n’ number for each characteristic;
Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables to calculate P-value unless otherwise specified;
Time from diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 to the onset (detection if onset unclear) of stroke;
§ Difference between groups was statistically significant; ⅠⅠStroke suspected clinically;
Only single observation was available.
Table 4.
Differences between survivors and non-survivors*
Characteristic Survivors (n=38) Non-survivors (n=35) P OR (95% CI)
Age (n=73) (yr) 60.5±16.6 66.5±14.3 0.1 1 (0.9-1.1)
Sex (n=50) 0.3 0.5 (0.2-1.7)
 Female 15 (30) 7 (14)
 Male 15 (30) 13 (26)
Symptomatic for COVID-19 at the time of stroke (n=64) 27 (42.2) 27 (42.2) 0.56 1.5 (0.4-6)
Type of stroke (n=73) 0.14 1.1 (0.3-4.1)§
 Ischaemic stroke 32 (43.8) 30 (41.1)
 Intracerebral haemorrhage 0 (0) 4 (5.5)
 Intracerebral haemorrhage with subarachnoid haemorrhage 2 (2.7) 1 (1.4)
 Cerebral venous thrombosis 2 (2.7) 0 (0)
 Subarachnoid haemorrhage 1 (1.4) 0 (0)
 Transient ischaemic attack 1 (1.4) 0 (0)
NIHSS (n=13) 11.5 (4.5-16.8) 2 (2-36) 0.74 1 (0.9-1.2)
TOAST (n=52) 0.2
 Large artery disease 12 (23.1) 7 (13.5) 0.5 (0.1-2.3)
 Small vessel disease 5 (9.6) 1 (1.9) 0.16 (0.01-1.9)
 Cardioembolic 4 (7.7) 5 (9.6) 1.3 (0.3-4.7)
 Other 0 (0) 1 (1.9) NA
 Cryptogenic 6 (11.5) 11 (21.2) 1.5 (0.3-7.6)
Critical illness (n=73)
 No 21 (28.8) 2 (2.7) 0.1 (0.02-0.4)
 Yes 17 (23.3) 33 (45.2) <0.001ⅠⅠ 20.4 (4.3-97)
Chest X-ray (n=8) 0.3 NA
 Normal 1 (12.5) 0 (0)
 Abnormal 3 (37.5) 4 (50)
Abnormal CT chest (n=37) 20 (54.1) 17 (45.9) NA NA
Abnormal CT pulmonary angiography (n=3) 1 (33.3) 1 (33.3) 0.4 NA
Risk factors
 Hypertension (n=72) 14 (19.4) 16 (22.2) 0.4 1.5 (0.6-3.9)
 Diabetes (n=72) 7 (9.7) 11 (15.3) 0.2 2.1 (0.7-6.3)
 Old stroke (n=72) 1 (1.4) 2 (2.8) 0.5 2.3 (0.2-27)
 Smoking (n=47) 2 (4.3) 6 (12.8) 0.03ⅠⅠ 6 (1.1-33.9)
 Atrial fibrillation (n=72) 4 (5.6) 4 (5.6) 0.9 1.1 (0.3-4.9)
 Heart failure (n=72) 0 (0) 3 (4.2) 0.06 NA
 Pacemaker (n=72) 0 (0) 1 (1.4) 0.3 NA
 Dyslipidemia (n=65) 6 (9.2) 11 (16.9) 0.052 3 (0.96-9.7)
 Coronary artery disease (n=72) 1 (1.4) 5 (6.9) 0.06 6.4 (0.7-58)
 Alcoholism (n=42) 1 (2.4) 1 (2.4) 0.66 1.9 (0.1-32)
No. of risk factors (n=72)
 0 16 (22.2) 3 (4.2) 0.004ⅠⅠ 0.2 (0.05-0.6)
 1 7 (9.7) 6 (8.3) 4.6 (0.9-24)
 ≥2 15 (20.8) 25 (34.7) 8.9 (2.2-35.7)
 Chronic kidney disease (n=8) 1 (12.5) 0 (0) 0.7 NA
 Cancer (n=10) 1 (10) 1 (10) 0.5 3 (0.1-73.6)
C-reactive protein (n=44) (mg/L) 81±95 125±83 0.02ⅠⅠ 2.6 (0.8-8.9)
D-dimer (n=44) (μg/L) 3,180±3,658 9,314±13,032 0.007ⅠⅠ 3.7 (1.1-13)**
Ferritin (n=9) (μg/L) 241±228 1,853†† 0.12 NA
Leucocyte count (n=17) (×109/L) 8.3±3 14.1±7.7 0.14 5.3 (0.6-46)
Lymphocyte (n=15) (×109/L) 1±0.5 0.9±0.7 0.5 0.8 (0.1-6.3)
Platelet (n=14) (×109/L) 245±93 192±98 0.1 NA
Creatinine (n=10) (μmol/L) 113±45 177±137 0.7 1.5 (0.1-25.4)
Aspartate transaminase (n=10) (U/L) 50±37 77±48 0.5 2 (0.1-27)
Alanine transaminase (n=8) (U/L) 31±18 40±24 0.65 NA
Procalcitonin (n=4) (μg/L) 0.08†† 5.97±7.1 0.17 NA
Troponin (n=11) (pg/mL) 310±348 3,044±6,264 0.36 1.2 (0.7-19.6)
Lactate dehydrogenase (n=11) (U/L) 302±99 811±201 0.008ⅠⅠ NA‡‡
aPTT (n=8) (sec) 26±14 44±8.5 0.17 8 (0.3-206)
International normalized ratio (n=6) 1.2±0 1.95±1.1 0.3 NA
Prothrombin time (n=4) 13.9±1.1 13.8†† 0.65 NA
Fibrinogen (n=7) (g/L) 4.9±1.9 7†† 0.32 NA
APLA positivity (n=4) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA NA
Lupus anticoagulant (n=2) 0 (0) 1 (50) NA NA
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; NA, not applicable; CT, computed tomography; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; APLA, antiphospholipid antibody.
* Data is not uniformly available for each patient leading to separate ‘n’ number for each characteristic;
Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables to calculate P-value unless otherwise specified;
ORs were calculated by logistic regression. The cut-off values used for calculating ORs were upper or lower limits of normal values (whichever differentiates normal from abnormal values) unless otherwise specified;
§ OR was calculated for ischaemic stroke when compared with non-ischaemic stroke; ⅠⅠThe difference between the groups was statistically significant;
A C-reactive protein (CRP) cut-off value of 100 mg/L was used arbitrarily to calculate the OR. The difference between the groups for CRP was significant by Mann-Whitney test even though the CI for OR included 1;
** D-dimer cut-off of 4,000 μg/L was used arbitrarily to calculate OR;
†† Only single observation was available;
‡‡ One of the cells in the contingency table used to calculate OR at a cut-off of 280 U/L of lactate dehydrogenase had null value precluding the calculation of the same.


1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497-506.
crossref pmid pmc
2. WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. WHO; https://covid19.who.int. 2020. Accessed August 21, 2020.
3. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-1069.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-1062.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1-9.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Leonardi M, Padovani A, McArthur JC. Neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19: a review and a call for action. J Neurol 2020;267:1573-1576.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Montalvan V, Lee J, Bueso T, De Toledo J, Rivas K. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020;194:105921.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Li Y, Li M, Wang M, Zhou Y, Chang J, Xian Y, et al. Acute cerebrovascular disease following COVID-19: a single center, retrospective, observational study. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2020;Jul. 2. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2020-000431.
9. Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, Kellner CP, Shoirah H, Singh IP, et al. Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of Covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e60.
crossref pmid
10. Yaghi S, Ishida K, Torres J, Mac Grory B, Raz E, Humbert K, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and stroke in a New York healthcare system. Stroke 2020;51:2002-2011.
crossref pmid
11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-269.
crossref pmid
12. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35-41.
crossref pmid
13. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009). CEBM; https://www.cebm.net/2009/06/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidencemarch-2009. Accessed August 21,2020.

14. Barrios-López JM, Rego-García I, Muñoz Martínez C, Romero-Fábrega JC, Rivero Rodríguez M, Ruiz Giménez JA, et al. Ischaemic stroke and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a causal or incidental association? Neurologia 2020;35:295-302.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Lindsberg PJ, Grau AJ. Inflammation and infections as risk factors for ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:2518-2532.
crossref pmid
16. Desforges M, Le Coupanec A, Dubeau P, Bourgouin A, Lajoie L, Dubé M, et al. Human coronaviruses and other respiratory viruses: underestimated opportunistic pathogens of the central nervous system? Viruses 2019;12:14.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Sarzi-Puttini P, Giorgi V, Sirotti S, Marotto D, Ardizzone S, Rizzardini G, et al. COVID-19, cytokines and immunosuppression: what can we learn from severe acute respiratory syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020;38:337-342.
crossref pmid
18. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-513.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:844-847.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Farrington P, Vallance P. Risk of myocardial infarction and stroke after acute infection or vaccination. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2611-2618.
crossref pmid
21. Boehme AK, Luna J, Kulick ER, Kamel H, Elkind MSV. Influenza-like illness as a trigger for ischemic stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018;5:456-463.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Lee KR, Bae JH, Hwang IC, Kim KK, Suh HS, Ko KD. Effect of influenza vaccination on risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology 2017;48:103-110.
crossref pmid
23. Al Saiegh F, Ghosh R, Leibold A, Avery MB, Schmidt RF, Theofanis T, et al. Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:846-848.
crossref pmid
24. Puelles VG, Lütgehetmann M, Lindenmeyer MT, Sperhake JP, Wong MN, Allweiss L, et al. Multiorgan and renal tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med 2020;383:590-592.
crossref pmid
25. Xu J, Zhong S, Liu J, Li L, Li Y, Wu X, et al. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the brain: potential role of the chemokine mig in pathogenesis. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1089-1096.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Aggarwal G, Lippi G, Michael Henry B. Cerebrovascular disease is associated with an increased disease severity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a pooled analysis of published literature. Int J Stroke 2020;15:385-389.
crossref pmid
27. Lodigiani C, Iapichino G, Carenzo L, Cecconi M, Ferrazzi P, Sebastian T, et al. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thromb Res 2020;191:9-14.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020;395:1417-1418.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Thornton P, McColl BW, Greenhalgh A, Denes A, Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Platelet interleukin-1alpha drives cerebrovascular inflammation. Blood 2010;115:3632-3639.
crossref pmid pdf
30. Fox SE, Akmatbekov A, Harbert JL, Li G, Quincy Brown J, Vander Heide RS. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: an autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:681-686.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Panichpisal K, Rozner E, Levine SR. The management of stroke in antiphospholipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2012;14:99-106.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, Xia P, Cao W, Jiang W, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e38.
crossref pmid
33. Hess DC, Eldahshan W, Rutkowski E. COVID-19-related stroke. Transl Stroke Res 2020;11:322-325.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
34. de Abajo FJ, Rodríguez-Martín S, Lerma V, Mejía-Abril G, Aguilar M, García-Luque A, et al. Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital: a case-population study. Lancet 2020;395:1705-1714.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Williams B, Zhang Y. Hypertension, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition, and COVID-19. Lancet 2020;395:1671-1673.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Sharifi-Razavi A, Karimi N, Rouhani N. COVID-19 and intracerebral haemorrhage: causative or coincidental? New Microbes New Infect 2020;35:100669.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center,Ulsan University College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Submission, status and progress, etc ⟫ E-mail: editor@j-stroke.org
Website and system ⟫ E-mail: journal@m2community.co.kr
Publishing company ⟫ E-mail: ka72sus@smileml.com
Developed in M2PI
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Stroke Society.
Close layer
prev next