Recanalization Outcomes and Procedural Complications in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19 Receiving Endovascular Treatment

Article information

J Stroke. 2025;27(1):128-132
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 January 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2024.04077
João Pedro Marto,1,*orcid_icon, Davide Strambo2,*, George Ntaios3, Thanh N Nguyen4, Pawel Wrona5, Simon Escalard6, Simona Marcheselli7, Ossama Yassin Mansour8, Blanca Fuentes9, Malgorzata Dorobek10, Marta Nowakowska-Kotas11, Elena Oana Terecoasa12, Jonathan M. Coutinho13, Mariana Carvalho-Dias14, Patricia Calleja15, João Sargento-Freitas16, Ana Paiva-Nunes17, Martin Šrámek18, Priyank Khandelwal19, Torcato Meira20, Mohamad Abdalkader4, Pascal Jabbour21, Martin Kovář22, Oscar Ayo-Martin23, Patrik Michel2, Roman Herzig24, Anna Członkowksa25, Jelle Demeestere26, Raul G. Nogueira27, Alexander Salerno2, Susanne Wegener28, Philipp Baumgartner28, Carlo W. Cereda29, Giovanni Bianco29, Morin Beyeler30, Marcel Arnold30, Emmanuel Carrera31, Paolo Machi32, Valerian Altersberger33, Leo Bonati33, Henrik Gensicke33, Manuel Bolognese34, Nils Peters35, Stephan Wetzel35, Marta Magriço1, João Nuno Ramos36, Rita Machado16, Carolina Maia16, Egídio Machado37, Patrícia Ferreira17, Teresa Pinho-e-Melo14, André Paula38, Manuel Alberto Correia38, Pedro Castro39, Elsa Azevedo39, Luís Albuquerque40, José Nuno-Alves41, Joana Ferreira-Pinto41, Liliana Pereira42, Miguel Rodrigues42, André Araújo43, Marta Rodrigues43, Mariana Rocha44, Ângelo Pereira-Fonseca45, Luís Ribeiro45, Ricardo Varela46, Sofia Malheiro46, Manuel Cappellari47, Cecilia Zivelonghi47, Giulia Sajeva47, Andrea Zini48, Mauro Gentile48, Stefano Forlivesi48, Ludovica Migliaccio48, Maria Sessa49, Sara La Gioia49, Alessandro Pezzini50, Davide Sangalli51, Marialuisa Zedde52, Rosario Pascarella53, Carlo Ferrarese54, Simone Beretta54, Susanna Diamanti54, Ghil Schwarz55,56, Giovanni Frisullo57, Pierre Seners58, Candice Sabben58, Michel Piotin6, Benjamin Maier6, Guillaume Charbonnier59, Fabrice Vuillier59, Loic Legris60, Pauline Cuisenier60, Francesca R. Vodret60, Gaultier Marnat61, Jean-Sebastien Liegey61, Igor Sibon61, Fabian Flottmann62, Gabriel Broocks62, Nils-Ole Gloyer62, Ferdinand O. Bohmann63, Jan Hendrik Schaefer63, Christian H. Nolte64, Heinrich Audebert64, Eberhard Siebert65, Marek Sykora66, Wilfried Lang66, Julia Ferrari66, Lukas Mayer-Suess67, Michael Knoflach67, Elke-Ruth Gizewski68, Jeffrey Stolp13, Lotte J. Stolze13, Paul J. Nederkoorn13, Ido van-den-Wijngaard69, Joke de Meris69, Robin Lemmen26, Sylvie De Raedt70, Fenne Vandervorst70, Matthieu Pierre Rutgers71, Antoine Guilmot71, Anne Dusart72, Flavio Bellante72, Fernando Ostos15, Guillermo Gonzalez-Ortega15, Paloma Martín-Jiménez15, Sebastian García-Madrona73, Antonio Cruz-Culebras73, Rocio Vera73, Maria-Consuelo Matute73, María Alonso-de-Leciñana9, Ricardo Rigual9, Exuperio Díez-Tejedor9, Soledad Pérez-Sánchez74, Joan Montaner74, Fernando Díaz-Otero75, Natalia Perez-de-la-Ossa76, Belén Flores-Pina76, Lucia Muñoz-Narbona76, Angel Chamorro77, Alejandro Rodríguez-Vázquez77, Arturo Renú77, Francisco Hernandez-Fernandez23, Tomas Segura23, Herbert Tejada-Meza78, Daniel Sagarra-Mur78, Marta Serrano-Ponz78, Thant Hlaing79, Isaiah See80, Robert Simister80, David J. Werring81, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen82, Annika Nordanstig83, Katarina Jood83, Alexandros Rentzos84, Libor Šimu˚ne24, Dagmar Krajíčková24, Antonín Krajina85, Robert Mikulík86, Martina Cviková86, Jan Vinklárek86, David Školoudík87, Martin Roubec87, Eva Hurtikova87, Rostislav Hrubý88, Svatopluk Ostry88, Ondrej Skoda89, Marek Pernicka89, Lubomír Kočí90, Zuzana Eichlová90, Martin Jíra90, Michal Panský22, Pavel Mencl22, Hana Paloušková91, Aleš Tomek92, Petr Janský92, Anna Olšerová92, Roman Havlíček18, Petr Malý18, Lukáš Trakal18, Jan Fiksa93, Matěj Slovák93, Michał Karlińsk25, Maciej Nowak25, Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz94, Anna Bochynska94, Tomasz Homa5, Katarzyna Sawczynska5, Agnieszka Slowik5, Ewa Wlodarczyk5, Marcin Wiącek95, Izabella Tomaszewska-Lampart95, Bartosz Sieczkowski95, Halina Bartosik-Psujek95, Marta Bilik96, Anna Bandzarewicz96, Justyna Zielińska-Turek10, Krystian Obara11, Paweł Urbanowski11, Sławomir Budrewicz11, Maciej Guziński97, Milena Świtońska97, Iwona Rutkowska98, Paulina Sobieszak-Skura98, Beata Łabuz-Roszak99, Aleksander Dębiec100, Jacek Staszewski100, Adam Stępień100, Jacek Zwiernik101, Grzegorz Wasilewski102, Cristina Tiu12, Razvan-Alexandru Radu12, Anca Negrila12, Bogdan Dorobat103, Cristina Panea104, Vlad Tiu104, Simona Petrescu105, Atilla Özcan-Özdemir106, Mostafa Mahmoud107, Hussam El-Samahy107, Hazem Abdelkhalek108, Jasem Al-Hashel109, Ismail Ibrahim Ismail109, Athari Salmeen110, Abdoreza Ghoreishi111, Sergiu Sabetay112, Hana Gross4, Piers Klein4, Kareem El Naamani19, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris19, Rawad Abbas19, Ghada-A Mohamed113, Alex Chebl114, Jiangyong Min115, Majesta Hovingh115, Jenney-P Tsai115, Muhib-A Khan115, Krishna Nalleballe116, Sanjeeva Onteddu116, Hesham-E Masoud117, Mina Michael117, Navreet Kaur117, Laith Maali118, Michael Abraham118, Ivo Bach19, Melody Ong19, Denis Babici19, Ayaz-M. Khawaja119, Maryam Hakemi119, Kumar Rajamani119, Vanessa Cano-Nigenda120, Antonio Arauz120, Pablo Amaya121, Natalia Llanos122, Akemi Arango122, Miguel A. Vences123, José-Domingo Barrientos124, Rayllene Caetano125, Rodrigo Targa125, Sergio Scollo126, Patrick Yalung127, Shashank Nagendra128, Abhijit Gaikwad128, Kwon-Duk Seo129, on Behalf of the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry
1Department of Neurology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal
2Stroke Centre, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
3Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
4Department of Neurology, Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
5Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Hospital, Cracow, Poland
6Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France
7Stroke Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy
8Alexandria University Hospitals and Affiliated Stroke Network, Alexandria, Egypt
9Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
10Department of Neurology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
11Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
12Department of Neurology, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania
13Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
14Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
15Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
16Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
17Stroke Unit, Hospital de São José, Lisbon, Portugal
18Cerebrovascular Centre, Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
19Endovascular Neurological Surgery & Neurology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA
20Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
21Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, PA, USA
22Cerebrovascular Centre, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
23Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
24Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
252nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
26Neurology Department, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
27Departments of Radiology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
28Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
29Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
30Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
31Stroke Centre, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
32Department of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
33Stroke Centre, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland
34Stroke Centre, Kantonsspital Lucerne, Switzerland
35Stroke Centre, Hirslanden Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
36Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
37Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
38Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
39Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
40Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
41Department of Neurology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
42Department of Neurology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
43Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
44Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
45Department of Neurology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal
46Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
47Stroke Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
48IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
49Department of Neurology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
50Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma; Stroke Care Program, Department of Emergency, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
51Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale, Lecco, Italy
52Neurology Unit, Stroke Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
53Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
54Department of Neurology, San Gerardo Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery and Milan Centre for Neuroscience, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
55Stroke Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
56Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit - ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
57Department of Neurology, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
58Department of Neurology, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France
59Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
60Neurology, Stroke Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Grenoble Alpes, France
61Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
62Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center-Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
63Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
64Department of Neurology and Centre for Stroke Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
65Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
66Department of Neurology, St. John’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
67Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
68Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
69Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Hague and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
70Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Centre for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
71Department of Neurology, Stroke Unit, Europe Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium
72Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
73Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
74Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
75Stroke Centre, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
76Stroke Unit, Germans Trias Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
77Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Hospital Clinic from Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
78Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón), Spain
79Stroke and Geriatric Medicine, Aintree University Hospital, United Kingdom
80Comprehensive Stroke Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Stroke Research Centre, University College London, United Kingdom
81University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
82Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog and Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Norway
83Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg and Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
84Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg and Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
85Department of Radiology, Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
86International Clinical Research Centre and Department of Neurology, St. Anne´s University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine at Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
87Center for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
88Department of Neurology, České Budějovice Hospital, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
89Department of Neurology, Jihlava Hospital, Jihlava, Czech Republic
90Neurocenter, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
91Department of Neurology, Karviná Miners Hospital Inc., Karviná, Czech Republic
92Cerebrovascular Centre, University Hospital in Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
93Cerebrovascular Centre, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
941st Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
95Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Poland
96Department of Neurology and Stroke, St. John Paul II Western Hospital, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
97Department of Radiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
98Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
99Stroke Intervention Centre, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Jan Biziel University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
100Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Poland
101Clinic of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
102Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
103Department of Radiology, Provincial Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
104Department of Radiology, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
105Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Elias University Emergency Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania
106Department of Neurology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
107Ain Shams University Affiliated Saudi German Hospital, Egypt
108Neuropsychiatry Department, Tanta University, Egypt
109Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, Kuwait
110Department of Neurology, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait
111Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
112Stroke Unit, Neurology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
113Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA
114Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
115Comprehensive Stroke Centre and Department of Neurosciences, Spectrum Health and Michigan State University, MI, USA
116Department of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
117Department of Neurology, Upstate University Hospital, NY, USA
118Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Centre, KS, USA
119Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
120Stroke Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia Manuel Velasco Suarez, Mexico City, Mexico
121Department of Neurology, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
122Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
123Department of Neurology, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Péru
124Hospital General San Juan de Dios, Guatemala, Guatemala
125Department of Neurology, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil
126Ramos Mejía Hospital, Stroke Unit, Buenos Aires, Argentina
127St. Luke’s Medical Center, Global City, Philippines
128Department of Neurology, Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Hospital, Mumbai, India
129Department of Neurology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
Correspondence: João Pedro Marto Department of Neurology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal, Rua da Junqueira nº126, 1349-019, Lisbon, Portugal Tel: +351-210432181 E-mail: joao.pedro.seabra.marto@gmail.com
*These authors contributed equally as first author.
†The full author list is provided in Appendix 1.
Received 2024 October 4; Accepted 2024 October 14.

Dear Sir:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular and other thrombotic events [1]. Previous studies have shown that patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a worse functional outcome than those without concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection [2,3]. In patients receiving acute revascularization treatments, our large retrospective analysis of the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry revealed higher rates of intracranial bleeding and worse clinical outcomes in patients with AIS and COVID-19 compared to contemporary AIS controls without COVID-19 [4]. Subsequent sub-analyses emphasized the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this subgroup of patients showing differences in outcome between patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 and controls without COVID-19 [5].

Several factors can contribute to poorer outcomes in patients with AIS and COVID-19 undergoing acute revascularization treatments [2,3,6], including lower recanalization rates and higher rates of procedural complications after endovascular treatment (EVT) [7,8].

We aimed to assess recanalization outcomes and procedural complication rates in patients with AIS and COVID-19 undergoing EVT in an international cohort by comparing them with a contemporary control group of non–COVID-19 patients from the same centers.

We conducted a secondary analysis on the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry [4]. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry were previously described [4]. For this study, only patients receiving EVT for intracranial occlusions were included (Supplementary Figure 1). All study procedures, study variables, and ethical standards were previously described [4].

The primary outcome of this study was recanalization after EVT assessed by the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score. Secondary procedural outcomes were: (1) successful recanalization after EVT (mTICI ≥2b); (2) first pass effect; (3) number of passes during EVT; and (4) procedure duration. Secondary safety outcomes were: (1) arterial perforation observed during EVT; (2) reocclusion during EVT; and (3) embolization into new non-ischemic territory during EVT. To assess the association of COVID-19 with the primary outcome and secondary procedural outcomes, we used multivariable regression models entering as independent variables the COVID-19 status together with prespecified baseline clinical and radiological variables identified from previous literature as variables known to be associated with the outcomes of interest. Depending on whether the outcome was ordinal, binary, or continuous, we used ordered logit regression, logistic regression, and quantile regression models, respectively. Data regarding EVT complications were available for all COVID-19 patients but only in a subset of controls. As such, to evaluate the association between COVID-19 and EVT complications, we performed a 1:3 propensity-score matching procedure between COVID-19 patients and the subset of controls with EVT complication data available. The association between COVID-19 and EVT complications was assessed using univariable binary logistic regression on the matched population. A detailed description on the statistical analysis methodology is available in Supplementary Methods.

Of the 15,128 patients included in the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry, 8,292 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the present analysis (Supplementary Figure 1). Of these, 497 (6.0%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. Comparisons between groups are shown in Table 1.

Baseline, stroke characteristics, imaging and treatment data

In the adjusted analysis, COVID-19 was associated with worse final mTICI score, lower successful recanalization, and a trend toward a lower first pass effect (Table 2).

Recanalization outcomes after endovascular treatment

EVT procedural complications were assessed in 493 (99.0%) patients with COVID-19 and in 2,275 (29.0%) controls. Control patients with and without data on procedural complications had similar baseline characteristics (Supplementary Table 1). Among patients with information on procedural complications after EVT, 491 with COVID-19 and 2,246 in the control group had complete data on the covariates selected for matching and were included in the analysis. After propensity-score matching of these patients, COVID-19 patients and their matched controls had a well-balanced distribution of baseline characteristics (Supplementary Figure 2). Patients with COVID-19 had higher rates of arterial perforation and reocclusion during EVT, and a trend toward higher rates of embolization into a new non-ischemic territory (Table 3).

Procedural complications during endovascular treatment

In this secondary analysis on the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry, we found that patients with COVID-19 had worse recanalization outcomes and higher rates of procedural complications such as arterial perforation and reocclusion in comparison with contemporaneous patients with AIS without COVID-19. To our knowledge, this was the first study to show such associations in a large sample of consecutive patients with and without COVID-19 that used adjustment for potential confounders. The presented results add to our previous finding, showing higher rates of intracranial bleeding and worse clinical outcomes in patients with AIS and COVID-19 compared to contemporary AIS controls without COVID-19 [9].

Several pathophysiological mechanisms associated with COVID-19 may explain these findings. Endothelial inflammation and dysfunction, induced platelet aggregation, coagulation cascade activation, and formation of antiphospholipid antibody complexes associated with COVID-19 likely lead to higher clot burden and clot adherence [9,10]. This complex interplay probably results in lower recanalization and increased rates of reocclusion. These same mechanisms, combined with SARS-CoV-2-induced hyperfibrinolysis and direct viral-mediated damage to the neurovascular unit [9,10] may contribute to lower integrity of vessel walls and to subsequent elevated rates of arterial perforation. Alternatively, emboli in patients with COVID-19 may be more difficult to recanalize and retrieve due to the activation of the coagulation cascade activation, requiring more aggressive and longer EVT procedures with increased perforation risk.

Our analysis has several strengths, including the large sample size from 30 countries across five continents, increasing the validity and generalizability of our results.

Limitations of our study include the retrospective design, non-blinded assessment, and absence of centralized imaging review, which may have influenced our results. The use of different thrombectomy equipment and techniques by stroke interventionists may have affected our results but were tentatively addressed by adjustment with a center cluster level variable. A significant number of centers did not report safety outcomes in control patients, which could have biased our results.

In conclusion, in this cohort study, patients with AIS and COVID-19 receiving EVT had lower rates of recanalization and a higher risk of arterial perforation and reocclusion, in comparison with contemporary AIS controls without COVID-19. These findings may contribute to the poorer outcome found in patients with AIS and COVID-19.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2024.04077.

Supplementary Table 1.

Comparison between control patients included and excluded in procedural complications analysis

jos-2024-04077-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1.

Inclusion flowchart.

jos-2024-04077-Supplementary-Fig-1,2.pdf
Supplementary Figure 2.

Standardized mean differences before (red points) and after (blue points) propensity-score matching (PSM) between the patients with COVID-19 and controls, for the variables used for matching. NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LVO, large vessel occlusion; ic-ICA, intracranial internal carotid artery; M1, middle cerebral artery (M1 segment); BA, basilar artery; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis.

jos-2024-04077-Supplementary-Fig-1,2.pdf

Notes

Funding statement

None

Conflicts of interest

Roman Herzig reports receiving research grants from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grant number DRO – UHHK 00179906) and Charles University, Czech Republic (grant number PROGRES Q40). Christian Nolte reports receiving research grants from the German Ministry of Research and Education, the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, and the German Center for Cardiovascular Research. He has also received speaker and/or advisory fees from Abbott, Alexion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer Pharma. Stavropoula Tjoumakaris reports receiving advisory fees from Medtronic and MicroVention. Jiangyong Min reports receiving advisory fees from Medtronic and Abbott. Muhib-A Khan reports receiving research grants from the National Institute of Health, Spectrum Health-Michigan State University Research Alliance, and Genentech. Patrik Michel reports receiving research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Heart Foundation. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: JPM, DS, GN, PM. Study design: JPM, DS, GN, PM. Data collection: all authors. Statistical analysis: DS. Writing—original draft: JPM, DS; GN, PM. Writing—review & editing: all authors. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

References

1. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:683–690.
2. Ntaios G, Michel P, Georgiopoulos G, Guo Y, Li W, Xiong J, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke: the global COVID-19 stroke registry. Stroke 2020;51:e254–e258.
3. Perry RJ, Smith CJ, Roffe C, Simister R, Narayanamoorthi S, Marigold R, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 associated stroke: a UK multicentre case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021;92:242–248.
4. Marto JP, Strambo D, Ntaios G, Nguyen TN, Herzig R, Czlonkowska A, et al. Safety and outcome of revascularization treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19: the global COVID-19 stroke registry. Neurology 2023;100:e739–e750.
5. Strambo D, Marto JP, Ntaios G, Nguyen TN, Michel P, ; Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry. Effect of asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke revascularization outcomes. Stroke 2024;55:78–88.
6. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 2020;324:782–793.
7. Escalard S, Maïer B, Redjem H, Delvoye F, Hébert S, Smajda S, et al. Treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with COVID-19: experience from Paris. Stroke 2020;51:2540–2543.
8. Cagnazzo F, Piotin M, Escalard S, Maier B, Ribo M, Requena M, et al. European multicenter study of ET-COVID-19. Stroke 2021;52:31–39.
9. Sashindranath M, Nandurkar HH. Endothelial dysfunction in the brain: setting the stage for stroke and other cerebrovascular complications of COVID-19. Stroke 2021;52:1895–1904.
10. Sagris D, Papanikolaou A, Kvernland A, Korompoki E, Frontera JA, Troxel AB, et al. COVID-19 and ischemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2021;28:3826–3836.

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Full author list

jos-2024-04077-Appendix-1.pdf

Article information Continued

Table 1.

Baseline, stroke characteristics, imaging and treatment data

Variables Total (n=8,292) Controls (n=7,795) COVID-19 (n=497) P
Center volume* <0.01
 <100 671 (8.1) 585 (7.5) 86 (17.3)
 100–199 2,434 (29.4) 2,268 (29.1) 166 (33.4)
 200–299 3,343 (40.3) 3,194 (41.0) 149 (30.0)
 ≥300 1,844 (22.2) 1,748 (22.4) 96 (19.3)
Demographics
 Age (yr) 73 (63–81) 73 (63–81) 70 (60–79) <0.01
 Male sex 4,041 (48.8) 3,756 (48.2) 285 (57.3) <0.01
 Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale 0.94
  0 5,831 (73.0) 5,474 (73.0) 357 (72.9)
  1 to 2 1,648 (20.6) 1,545 (20.6) 103 (21.0)
  3 to 5 513 (6.4) 483 (6.4) 30 (6.1)
Vascular risk factors
 Hypertension 5,763 (69.8) 5,434 (70.0) 329 (66.2) 0.08
 Diabetes mellitus 2,060 (24.8) 1,893 (24.4) 167 (33.6) <0.01
 Dyslipidemia 3,743 (45.4) 3,541 (45.7) 202 (40.6) 0.03
 Current smoking 1,734 (21.4) 1,646 (21.6) 88 (17.8) 0.05
 Atrial fibrillation 3,078 (37.3) 2,907 (37.5) 171 (34.5) 0.20
 Heart failure 1,183 (15.2) 1,109 (15.2) 74 (15.6) 0.85
 Coronary artery disease 1,330 (16.4) 1,247 (16.3) 83 (17.3) 0.64
 Active cancer 368 (5.0) 345 (5.0) 23 (5.1) 0.988
Treatment at stroke onset
 Oral anticoagulants 1,648 (19.9) 1,535 (19.8) 113 (22.7) 0.13
 Antiplatelets 2,101 (25.5) 1,980 (25.6) 121 (24.4) 0.62
 Statins 2,630 (33.7) 2,484 (33.9) 146 (30.9) 0.20
Stroke characteristics
 LTSW-to-door (min) 120 (66–263) 120 (66–264) 120 (61–260) 0.36
 Admission NIHSS 16 (10–20) 16 (10-20) 17 (12–21) <0.01
 Vascular territories 0.40
  Carotid 7,371 (90.0) 6,924 (88.9) 447 (90.1)
  Vertebrobasilar 729 (8.8) 693 (8.9) 36 (7.3)
  Multiple 186 (2.2) 173 (2.2) 13 (2.6)
 Admission systolic BP (mm Hg) 148 (130–165) 148 (130–165) 144 (130–160) <0.01
 Admission blood glucose (mmol/L) 6.9 (5.9–8.4) 6.9 (5.9–8.4) 7.2 (6.1–9.2) <0.01
Acute imaging
 ASPECTS (or pc-ASPECTS) 9 (8–10) 9 (8–10) 9 (7–10) <0.01
 Most proximal arterial occlusion 0.11
  Intracranial ICA 1,766 (21.3) 1,654 (21.2) 112 (22.5)
  MCA M1 4,156 (50.1) 3,906 (50.1) 250 (50.3)
  MCA M2-4 1,500 (18.1) 1,414 (18.1) 86 (17.3)
  ACA A1-2 48 (0.6) 46 (0.6) 2 (0.4)
  PCA P1-2 116 (1.4) 109 (1.4) 7 (1.4)
  BA 522 (6.3) 498 (6.4) 24 (4.8)
  V4 105 (1.3) 100 (1.3) 5 (1.0)
  Other 79 (0.9) 68 (0.9) 11 (2.2)
 Tandem lesion 1,255 (15.2) 1,166 (15.0) 89 (17.9) 0.09
Stroke etiology <0.01
 Large artery atherosclerosis 1,599 (19.3) 1,498 (19.2) 101 (20.3)
 Cardioembolism 3,921 (47.3) 3,715 (47.7) 206 (41.5)
 Small vessels disease 26 (0.3) 25 (0.3) 1 (0.2)
 Dissection 188 (2.3) 178 (2.3) 10 (2.0)
 Other determined cause 386 (4.7) 320 (4.1) 66 (13.3)
 Undetermined 2,172 (26.2) 2,059 (26.4) 113 (22.7)
Acute revascularization treatment
 IV thrombolysis 3,866 (46.6) 3,655 (46.9) 211 (42.5) 0.06
 LTSW-to-puncture (min) 273 (187–412) 272 (187–412) 285 (190.2–410.8) 0.63
 General anesthesia 2,941 (35.7) 2,718 (35.1) 223 (45.0) <0.01

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or as n (%).

LTSW, last-time-seen-well; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; BP, blood pressure; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; pc-ASPECTS, posterior circulation ASPECTS; ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ACA, anterior cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; BA, basilar artery; V4, vertebral artery, segment 4.

*

Refers to the number of patients included by each center in the study.

Table 2.

Recanalization outcomes after endovascular treatment

Variables Total (n=8,292) Controls (n=7,795) COVID-19 (n=497) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Final mTICI 0.70 (0.58 to 0.86)* 0.72 (0.59 to 0.89)*
 0–1 658 (8.0) 597 (7.7) 61 (12.3)
 2a 442 (5.3) 404 (5.2) 38 (7.6)
 2b 2,111 (25.5) 1,988 (25.5) 123 (24.7)
 2c 877 (10.6) 815 (10.5) 62 (12.5)
 3 4,182 (50.6) 3,969 (51.1) 213 (42.9)
Successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2b) 7,170 (86.7) 6,772 (87.1) 398 (80.1) 0.59 (0.47 to 0.75) 0.59 (0.44 to 0.79)
First pass effect 2,498 (30.2) 2,376 (30.5) 122 (24.6) 0.74 (0.60 to 0.91) 0.79 (0.63 to 1.00)
Total number of device passes 1.21 (0.96 to 1.53) 1.13 (0.88 to 1.44)
 1 3,855 (46.5) 3,642 (46.7) 213 (42.9)
 2 1,972 (23.8) 1,860 (23.9) 112 (22.5)
 3 1,236 (14.9) 1,152 (14.8) 84 (16.9)
 >3 1,229 (14.8) 1,141 (14.6) 88 (17.7)
Procedure duration 40 (25–65) 40 (25–65) 40 (25–65) 0.00 (-3.74 to 3.74) -2.25 (-6.24 to 1.74)

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or as n (%).

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; mTICI, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction.

*

Common adjusted odds ratio for higher mTICI;

Common adjusted odds ratio for higher number of passes;

Beta coefficient from quantile regression. Multivariable models displayed no multicollinearity (maximal variance inflation factor of 1.1).

Table 3.

Procedural complications during endovascular treatment

Variables Total (n=1,964) Controls (n=1,473) COVID-19 (n=491) Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Arterial perforation observed during EVT 29 (1.5) 17 (1.2) 12 (2.4) 2.14 (1.12–4.10) 0.02
Embolization into a non-ischemic territory during EVT 76 (3.9) 48 (3.3) 28 (5.7) 1.79 (0.97–3.32) 0.06
Reocclusion of recanalized artery during EVT 89 (4.5) 46 (3.1) 43 (8.8) 2.98 (1.75–5.09) <0.01

Values are presented as numbers (proportions).

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EVT, endovascular treatment.